A BRIEF HISTORY OF SOLOMON'S PROPHECIES



Our essay A Rosetta Stone Theory for Decoding the Voynich Manuscript summarized the evidence that the Voynich manuscript (VMS) was the original source for thirty-nine of the Nostradamus prophecies and that the Rosicrucians associated those prophecies with King Solomon of Biblical fame. With knowledge of the Solomon prophecies at hand, we were able to undertake a profound investigation into the early history of those prophecies. This essay will provide the results of our research and the conclusions that we drew therefrom. The reader should keep in mind that some of these conclusions are based on interpretation of abstruse writings and thus may or may not reflect historical accuracy.


A Morten St. George Investigation

As we saw, the Rosicrucians, finding themselves unable to identify the VMS plants, considered the possibility that the VMS depicted the exotic plants that King Solomon introduced into his gardens. But this alone might not be why they likewise attributed the VMS prophecies to Solomon. Legends speak of ancient scrolls found underneath the ruins of Solomon's Temple during excavations undertaken there in the 1120s and then brought back to Europe.

One reason for believing that those scrolls could have contained Solomon's Prophecies is that during the following decade, the 1130s, a Welsh monk wrote a synopsis of those prophecies, some three to four thousand words long, in Latin. There are so many links between that synopsis and the surviving prophecies (such as rare words and equivalent phrases found in both) that there can be little doubt that this monk had sight of the Solomon prophecies.

Though the monk surely knew that the prophecies came from Solomon's Temple, for reasons unknown he does not attribute authorship to Solomon but rather to someone else. Possibly he rejected Solomon as author based on what Solomon Prophecy VI-2 had to say (the number comes from Nostradamus):
 

Solomon Prophecy Nostradamus Number VI-2

In the year 580 more or less,
One shall await a very strange age:
In the year 700 and 3 skies in testimony,
Many nations one to five shall make change,

In view of fact that these dates (the earliest dates given in the prophecies) are in ascending rather than descending order, one must assume that they are CE and not BCE, thereby reducing the chances that Solomon was their author. And then there's Solomon Prophecy VIII-76, apparently the first one written by the Prophet, which must also be taken into account:
 

Solomon Prophecy Nostradamus Number VIII-76

More ‘Macelin’ than king in England
Born in obscure place, by force he shall attain the empire:
Of loose morals, without faith, without law, the ground shall bleed,
His time approaches so near that I sigh.

One can only guess at this, but it looks like the monk merged the name ‘Macelin’ with the name Myrddin, a legendary poet and madman from his Welsh homeland, to arrive at the author of the prophecies: Merlin, calling his synopsis Prophetiae Merlini and at the same time giving a name to the English king mentioned in the first verse: Arthur. Speaking of madmen, legend has it Merlin himself went mad at the battle of Arfderydd in the year 573, which conveniently brings us close to the year 580 (more or less) given in the first prophecy.

Before moving on, we should note that the final verse of Solomon Prophecy IX-31 can be construed as alluding to the ground below Solomon's Temple (where the prophecies were presumably found): "Dans temple à Pasques abysmes enfondrez," Within the Temple at Passover abysses founded. It is noteworthy that beyond the exotic plants of the VMS and the place of discovery, we have a textual consideration from within the prophecies for associating them with King Solomon.

Later in the 12th century and continuing into the 13th century, commentaries on the Solomon prophecies appeared in southern France, in a mystical book called the Sefer ha-Bahir and in isolated fragments (including one that briefly describes thirty-two of the prophecies attributing a ‘Path of Wisdom’ to each), all written anonymously in the Hebrew language. However, beyond possible association with Solomon via the concept of wisdom (the term ‘Wisdom of the Inhabitants of the East’ reminds us of ‘Ceux d’Orient’ of Solomon Prophecy I-49), the prophecies are not attributed to him. Instead, we find an indication that the mystics thought the author was the archangel Metatron (the heavenly scribe) and other indications that they thought the prophecies were written by the prophet Elijah and/or delivered by him in his Chariot, presumably in a return descent to Earth during early medieval times.

In the 20th century, those medieval writings in Hebrew were investigated by cabala pioneer Gershom Scholem who, in his book about mystic symbolism, cites the Bahir as saying: "Thus God said: I love the gates of Zion when they are open. Why? Because they are on the side of evil." Scholem exclaims: "This much is certain: the last thing we should expect to find in a work of Jewish piety is the notion that the ‘gates of Zion,’ through which, to the Jewish mind, the creative energy of Israel is communicated and in which it is concentrated are ‘on the side’ of Evil."

Before criticizing the mystics, Scholem could have tried asking himself a few questions. Was it possible for evil to fight against the great enemies of Zion, such as ancient Rome? And what did they mean by evil? For that he could have turned to another of his books: "We learn that Satan is the ‘north wind’ (section 107), a power that acts from the north." So now let's see what Solomon Prophecy II-99 has to say about Boreas, the north wind:
 

Solomon Prophecy Nostradamus Number II-99

Roman land that interprets the augury,
Shall by Gallic people be much vexed,
More Celtic nation shall fear the hour,
Boreas, the army having pushed too far.

Everyone knows that the Gauls fiercely fought the Romans, but perhaps less known is the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest where a large Roman army was wiped out having pushed too far into Germany. Note that the ‘north wind’ had another name, which was Aquilon, and before the Romans, the Babylonians were the great enemies of Zion. Let's now look at Solomon Prophecy X-86:
 

Solomon Prophecy Nostradamus Number X-86

Like a griffin shall come the king of Europe,
Accompanied by those of the North,
Of reds and whites shall conduct great troop,
And they shall go against the King of Babylon.

And once again evil fights the enemies of Zion. Elsewhere on the Bahir, Scholem notes "Moses Cordovero (ca. 1569) thought it possible that the book was composed before (!) the destruction of the Temple." Scholem's exclamation point aside, Cordovero makes sense: granted that the Bahir includes extensive commentary on Solomon's Prophecies and that those prophecies were found underneath the ruins of Solomon's Temple, it follows that the Bahir had to have been written either a) after excavation by the Knights Templar, or b) before the destruction of the Temple!

In the year 1244, a mountain-top fortress in southwestern France, the last stronghold of a heretical religious sect, came under siege. Per historical accounts, just before the fall of the fortress, a few of the heretics made a daring escape down the steep slopes, carrying with them the ‘great treasure’ of their religion. Of the heretics who were unable to escape, some two-hundred were burned alive in a giant bonfire in a field below the fortress.

There are three reasons for believing that the great treasure that escaped this siege were Solomon's Prophecies:

i. By legend, Christian Rosenkreutz was educated by those heretics. Granted that Rosenkreutz, per another investigation, was found to be a fictional character created by one of the decoders of the VMS, the matter is relevant.

ii. Solomon Prophecy VIII-83 apparently alludes to those heretics:

Solomon Prophecy Nostradamus Number VIII-83

The greatest sail out of the port of Zara,
Near Byzantium shall make its enterprise,
Loss of enemy & the friend shall not be
The third to two shall make great pillage and taking.

The prophecy tells the story of the infamous Fourth Crusade where the Crusaders, without funds to pay Venice for maritime transport, captured the Christian enclave of Zara for her as payment. Afterward, instead of continuing to Egypt as planned, the Crusaders proceeded to plunder the Christian city of Constantinople (formerly called Byzantium).

Though there appears to be no surviving historical record, this prophecy would have made the pope who instigated the Fourth Crusade the laughingstock of southern France. Thus, it is not surprising the Pope Innocent III (‘the third’) initiated a second crusade (‘to two’) to wipe out the heretics of southern France and once again there was great pillage and taking.

iii. By virtue of the following drawing found on the foldout behind folio 86 of the VMS:
 

Voynich Manuscript Depiction of a Heretic Fortress

We see the besieged mountain-top fortress and its steep slopes on the top of this drawing. A single coned tower with balcony and windows matches an illustration of this fortress from an independent medieval manuscript. Below the fortress, we see a field where the number of stars and glyphs add up to just over two hundred, that is, the number of heretics that were burned in that bonfire. Below the field, we see a depiction of the flames of that bonfire.

Heretical writings were destroyed by the Inquisition so there is no way of knowing for sure who these heretics thought was the author of Solomon's Prophecies. Most likely, they attributed authorship to the ‘Good God’ that they worshiped, contrasting him with the ‘Evil God’ worshiped by everyone else in Europe.

At this point, let's clarify that no one, not even a heretic, is likely to believe that their god would write something using mundane earthly materials. It had to be the scrolls, as much as the words, that caused them to think of divine origin. In a passage from the first prose introduction to the published prophecies, attributed to Nostradamus but more likely written by one of the heretics some two or three centuries earlier, we read (17th century translation):

"And although this occult Philosophy was not forbidden, I could never be persuaded to meddle with it, although many Volumns concerning that Art, which hath been concealed a great while, were presented to me, but fearing what might happen, after I had read them, I presented them to Vulcan, who while he was a devouring them, the flame mixing with the Air, made an unwonted light more bright then the usual flame, and as if it had been a Lightning, shining all the house over, as if it had been all in a flame."

This passage insinuates that Solomon's scrolls had light-emitting qualities. On mysticism of the late 12th century, Scholem finds "we are dealing here with something really new, with revelations of the prophet Elijah ‘and the appearance of the holy spirit in our academy’;" one can imagine that the concept of the holy spirit was derived from scrolls (prophecies here called revelations) that emitted a glowing light and, indeed, it is possible to surmise that a noted mystic of that epoch was temporarily blinded from staring at it too long. Meanwhile, we have been informed that Solomon's scrolls were destroyed but, as we know, a copy of the text (called black light) engraved thereon has survived to reach us via the VMS.

From 1244 to the late 16th century, there is no historical record of Solomon's Prophecies anywhere in Europe. Radiocarbon aside, scholars are unable to find anything in the internal content of the VMS that would convincingly date it later than 1244. Precedence has been found for the zodiacal drawings, and there is no depiction of any recognizable royal or religious personage, no depiction of the Black Death that wiped out perhaps half the population of Europe in the 14th century, and no depiction of the Hundred Years War so vividly displayed in other manuscripts of that epoch. Even the VMS plants cannot be associated with anything in Europe. The heretics who escaped the siege of 1244 simply vanished, and so did Solomon's Prophecies.

Turning our attention to faraway places, we found references to prophecy in the chronicles of the conquest of Peru, including the following (17th century translation): "And herein he was the more troubled upon remembrance of the Prophecy of an ancient Oracle, which foretold them, that after such a Number of years, and after the Reign of so many Kings, there should arrive strange Nations, never before seen in those parts, who should take their Kingdom from them, and destroy their Government and Idolatrous Religion."

Some believe that in order to fulfill this prophecy, the vast armies of the Inca, numbering in the tens of thousands, voluntarily submitted themselves to slaughter by a small group of Spaniards. In any case, let's now compare the Inca Prophecy with Solomon Prophecy V-92 (in the Roger edition, it was misnumbered surely to affirm the gap below which, while allowing geometric games to be played on the numbers, does not alter the translation):
 

Solomon Prophecy Nostradamus Number V-92

After the seat [throne] held for seventeen years,
Five shall change in such revolved term,
Then one shall be elected [or chosen] of the same time,
Who of the Romans shall not be very conformable.

The chronicles date the Inca Prophecy to the time of Viracocha Inca, who reigned from 1410 to 1438, a period which surprisingly corresponds quite well with the range given by radiocarbon for dating the VMS, 1404 to 1438. And indeed, there would be five more Inca kings when the Spanish (Roman Catholics) arrived.

Note that Viracocha Inca himself was not the "ancient Oracle": the chronicles say that the prophecy was "delivered by Revelation from his Father the Sun." But the chronicles are far from consistent on this point, at times attributing the prophecy to the Sun god and at times attributing it to the creator-god Viracocha. Perhaps Solomon Prophecy II-28 was the source of this confusion:
 

Solomon Prophecy Nostradamus Number II-28

The penultimate of the surname of the prophet,
Shall take Diana for his day and repose:
Far he shall wander by frenetic head,
And delivering a great people from impositions.

Apparently, Solomon's Prophecies wish to reveal the name of their author but want us to undertake some research in order to ascertain that name: we need to identify the final two persons (or kings) who had the author's name or who adopted it for their own name, and we are only provided with a few obscure details regarding the first of last two, such as the fact that he died on a Monday granted that Diana was a Moon goddess.

Here's another citation from the chronicles, reportedly being Viracocha Inca's last words:

"Likewise you are to observe, that in me the number of twelve Kings is completed; and I further make known to you, that in a few Years after my departure out of this Life, that this new Nation will invade you, and then will be accomplished that which our Father the Sun hath revealed, that they shall become your Lords and Masters … and lastly, I leave my Peace with you, for I am summoned by my Father the Sun to rest and repose with him."

It seems Viracocha Inca was quite egotistical and, wishing to make himself the topic of the prophecy, he envisions that the five of second verse of V-92 comes out of (in such revolved term) the seventeen of the first verse, leaving twelve. Note that his "rest and repose" reminds us of the "day and repose" of prophecy II-28.

A study of Andean dark cloud cosmology leads us to surmise that the Sun god (when his home the Sun sets at the end of the day) might then by night connect himself with the first constellation to rise along the southeastern horizon, namely, the serpent nebula that stretches across the Milky Way. Serpents were called Amaru (previously spelled Amaro) in both the Quechua and Aymara languages. Thus, it looks like Viracocha Inca made a big mistake by adopting the name of Viracocha to fulfill the prophecy: he simply picked the wrong god. He should have adopted the name Amaru, as did the last king of the Incas (Túpac Amaru I), who had his head chopped off in the year 1571 (our calendar) and placed on top of a pole in the Plaza of Cuzco. For many days the Incas came from the four parts of the empire to honor their king, and they never forgot his revolt against Spanish rule.

In any case, the Inca Sun god now joins King Solomon, Merlin the Prophet, Elijah the Prophet, the Good God, the Holy Spirit, the archangel Metatron, and Viracocha as postulated candidates for authorship of Solomon's Prophecies. After first endorsing the Holy Spirit, the second prose introduction to the published prophecies proceeds to add Satan to the list. Clearly, no one knew who wrote Solomon's Prophecies and everyone is just guessing. Lest we be accused of schizophrenia, we will not reveal that the prophecies themselves tend to support the Inca Sun god as their author.

There is, however, very little likelihood that the French heretics of the 13th century migrated to Peru which lies on the opposite side of the Americas from France. Moreover, protein analysis of the VMS parchment reveals that its underlying source was the subfamily Bovinae (cow) of which there were none in Peru. But in North America, including parts of Mexico, there were bison, a very close relative of domestic cattle even to the point of interbreeding.

This leads us to a logical conclusion: the VMS (the conduit of Solomon's Prophecies) was compiled in Mexico by converts to the heresy. We say converts rather than descendants because those heretics did not believe in procreation and hence they would have had no descendants. But they certainly strove to make converts and, like they did for converts back in Europe, would have taught them how to read and write and how to make parchment (a skilled task). Thus, native Americans wrote the VMS. They conserved the writings of the European heretics, diligently copying the prophecies onto fresh parchment along with the writings and drawings depicting the European history of the heresy, plus those pages depicting life in the Louisiana swamps after first arrival in the Americas. And the native Americans, known to have a deep interest in herbal medicine going back many centuries, would have conducted the herbal research reflected in the VMS.

Note that the American botanist Arthur O. Tucker has associated the VMS plants with Mexico. Beyond plants like jalapeño peppers and dozens more, the vast correlations with Mexico include VMS depictions of animals such as the armadillo, vials whose pattern of alternating colors remind us of what we see, to this day, on Mexican textiles, and, last but not least, found throughout much of Mexico: volcanoes, and even a smoking one! As crazy as Mexico may seem to some, it was the likely home of Solomon's Prophecies in the late Middle Ages.
 

Voynich Manuscript Depictions of Mexican Things

The New Atlantis (see our Rosetta Stone essay for information on the relevance of this work) refers to "Mexico, then named Tyrambel," and also to "Peru, then called Coya," and continues "they both made two great expeditions: they of Tyrambel through the Atlantic to the Mediterranean Sea, and they of Coya, through the South Sea, upon this our island." The part of Mexico called Tyrambel (presumably where the VMS was written) remains to be determined but Coya (generally spelled Colla but pronounced Coya) is a real word that refers to the southern part of greater Peru covering Lake Titicaca and the ancient city of Tiwanaku. Note that "our island" could very well be the island of Great Britain as, from Peru, you must first sail into the South Sea to reach it. In fact, the first four words of the New Atlantis are "We sailed from Peru."

There seem to be three possibilities for the transport of the Solomon prophecies from Mexico to Peru: i. Heretic missionaries brought the VMS from Mexico to Peru not long after it was written, and then a Spanish adventurer named Pedro Sarmiento de Gamboa acquired it in Peru during the 16th century; ii. Sarmiento acquired the VMS in Mexico and brought it to Peru around the year 1555, thus the Inca Prophecy was retroactively invented as an excuse for the rapid demise of the Inca; and iii. Sarmiento brought the VMS to Peru around 1555 but another copy of the prophecies was brought from Mexico to Peru during or prior to the time of Viracocha Inca (who died in 1438).

In 1568, Sarmiento became second in command of a fleet that had set out from Peru to explore the South Pacific. This expedition discovered the Solomon Islands in the western Pacific and, later, Sarmiento was given credit for the discovery. It is quite plausible that Solomon's mines were only a pretext (there were no mines on those islands) to call them Solomon, apparently so-named by Sarmiento himself as a manuscript attributed to him was the only one that referred to them by that name. Sarmiento claimed to have information that there were many "islands and continents" (we encounter the phrase "islands or continents" in the New Atlantis) in the Southern Ocean waiting to be discovered for Spain. Scholars assume that the Incas had provided him with this information but more likely (the Incas were not a seafaring people) he got the idea from Solomon's Prophecies, in particular, from Solomon Prophecy X-25:
 

Solomon Prophecy Nostradamus Number X-25

Only part of the first line concerns us here: To open passage to Brisanne. Note that this name has eight letters, just like Bensalem (the name of the island utopia in New Atlantis) and that these two words match on three letters: B _ _ S A _ _ _. Thus, with reinforcement from the New Atlantis, it becomes very likely that the Solomon Islands, today a member state of the United Nations, were named after the prophecies that led to their discovery.

Cryptologists may have noticed that the second line of X-25 is written largely in Spanish that could also be the underlying VMS language. As for the mysterious el tago, we believe it refers to someone from Toledo, a city built on the Tagus River.

In 1584, Sarmiento defected to England where he became a prisoner and then good friend of Sir Walter Raleigh (a Raleigh letter attests to this) and where he had a least one very lengthy conversation with the English Queen. It is hard to imagine that he could have avoided contact with William Cecil, Elizabeth's right-hand man, who appears on the cover of The Herball or Generall Historie of Plantes (see our Rosetta Stone essay for more information) opposite the unidentified poet laureate. Perhaps through Cecil, or maybe through Raleigh's contacts including the French ambassador, Sarmiento met and joined forces with the poet and two others to create a secret society:

"After this manner began the Fraternity of the Rosie Cross; first, by four persons onely, and by them was made the Magical Language and writing, with a large Dictionary, which we yet dayly use to Gods praise and glory, and do finde great wisdom therein; they made also the first part of the Book M."

No, by Book M. (period included) the Fama (17th century translation) is not referring to the VMS but to Les Propheties de M. Michel Nostradamus which conceal the VMS prophecies attributed to Solomon. The "first part" of that book would be the Roffet edition of 1588 (possibly early 1589 on our calendar) containing one prose introduction and 588 stanzas in total. The first complete edition (containing 942 stanzas including a second part of 300 stanzas preceded by another prose introduction) was published by Rousseau in 1590, then subsequently revised by the authors and, in the name of Rigaud, backdated to 1568.

"Also our building (although one hundred thousand people had very near seen and beheld the same) shall for ever remain untouched, undestroyed, and hidden to the wicked world."

The Fama (1614) ends with this pessimistic outlook and possibly there is a hint of despair therein. Were the prophecies failing to come true? Two prophecies were dated 1607 and one 1609. By 1614, the Nostradamus prophecies had gone through numerous editions and a hundred thousand people may indeed have seen them without recognizing the prophecies of Solomon hidden therein. Their ‘building’, like Solomon's House in the New Atlantis, has to refer to the structure that holds the Solomon prophecies, namely, the Nostradamus publication, a book.

Returning now to Sarmiento, our theory that he brought the VMS from Peru to London in 1584 is not as far-fetched as it may seem. In 1572, Sarmiento wrote a book called Historia de los Incas which remained unpublished until the early 20th century having been ‘discovered’ not long before the discovery of the VMS. But it turns out that the initial chapters of this manuscript were a major source of inspiration for the second prose introduction to the Nostradamus prophecies (textual comparisons led to the discovery of numerous equivalent concepts and phrases), thus Sarmiento is solidly linked to the VMS.

In and of itself, Sarmiento's history of the Incas may provide us with some useful information. For example, from what he tells us we are able to construe that Indi (now spelled Inti), meaning "pajaro del Sol," Sun bird, became recognized as a great Prophet having flown around the Andes over the course of several decades making one successful prediction after another. Sarmiento dates Indi to the epoch of Mango Capac, the first Inca who became king in 565, and Cinchi Roca, the second Inca who died in the year 675: "Murio en el ano de seiscientos y setenta y cinco anos de la natividad de Nuestro Senor Jesucristo, siendo rey de Espana Bamba y emperador Leon cuarto, Papa Donus." To confirm the accuracy of his dates, Sarmiento correlates them with European kings and popes who reigned at the same time. In case you didn't notice, these dates correspond fairly well with the 580 (more or less) to 700 range that we saw in Solomon Prophecy VI-2.

According to Sarmiento, Cinchi Roca, accompanied by his stone idol called Guanachiri Amaro, lived in the House of the Sun, called Indicancha (today called Coricancha, House of Gold), so this edifice in Cuzco had to have been built during the sixth or seventh centuries, likewise, perhaps, all the megalithic structures of Peru were built at that time. This would be some six to eight hundred years earlier than what the history books tell us, but note that the primary objective of the Spanish historians, other than Sarmiento, was to suppress Inca worship of their Sun god and to do so by means of demeaning and truncating Inca history. It seems the Spanish never found any Incas capable of moving stones weighing up to a hundred tons or more nor anyone who could even explain how to move such stones, so it is ridiculous to think those structures were built in the recent past.
 

Inca Sun bird on the Gate of the Sun

Here, on the Gate of the Sun in Tiwanaku (Sarmiento spells it Tiaguanaco), we see a depiction of Indi, the Inca Sun bird, likely made contemporaneously with his presence in Andes during the seventh century. However, placing aside those scepters tipped with bird heads, this thing looks nothing like a bird. Are we to believe that it was able to fly over to England without wings? It is by no means assured that Indi can remain a viable candidate for authorship of the Solomon prophecies.

Curiously, one of the prophecies can be viewed as reinforcing Inca beliefs that their Sun bird came from the celestial Sun. Solomon Prophecy V-81 begins with the words: "L'oiseau royal sur la cité solaire," The royal bird over the city of the Sun, and the second line of reads "Sept mois deuant fera nocturne augure," Seven months before shall make nocturnal augury, where the word nocturnal could be what linked the Sun bird to the aforementioned Serpent nebula. Nonetheless, it is not always easy to distinguish beliefs and customs that arose in ancient times from those resulting from heretic missionaries and the prophecies that they brought to Peru. For example, the sacred ‘Virgins of the Sun’ seem ancient but might be a reflection of heretic beliefs in celibacy as well as in an elevated status for women.

Returning again to Europe, the history books tell us that Sarmiento ran into a streak of bad luck, finding himself locked up in a Huguenot dungeon in southwestern France from late 1585 to early 1589. Similarly, everyone who worked on decoding the VMS and on writing nine hundred predictions (to mask Solomon's Prophecies) had to be someone whose whereabouts cannot be verified for some significant portion of that time frame, such as said to have been absent from university, or went wandering to escape the plague in his home town, or gone off tiger hunting in Egypt, or whatever.

It is clear that an enormous effort went into producing Book M., Les Prophéties of M. Michel Nostradamus, but why did they do it? The only rational explanation that we can think of is that they thought Solomon's Prophecies were genuine, that they accurately predicted future events. They therefore wanted to cast the prophecies into the distant future (the last date given in the prophecies was 1999) when they might be useful to people then alive to find a way to prevent the great calamities predicted therein. Perhaps erroneous perceptions that those prophecies had already had some degree of success influenced their thinking.

From our point of view, we need only note that some years ago a paranormal skeptic by the name of James Randi convincingly demonstrated that the famed Prophecies of Nostradamus (which include the Prophecies of Solomon) were a charlatanism that expressed no real foresight of anything. One of the many tactics for deception identified by Randi was to write so ambiguously that each prophecy could be applied to many historical events.

For example, in our Rosetta Stone essay, we explained how a Solomon prophecy may have furnished a strategy for defeating the Spanish Armada. (It is unknown what additional assistance could have been provided by Sarmiento, who just a few years earlier was placed in command of a fleet to hunt down Sir Francis Drake on the open seas.) Let's have another look at Solomon Prophecy V-35:
 

Solomon Prophecy Nostradamus Number V-35

By free city of the great sea Saline,
That carries again the stone to the stomach,
English fleet shall come under a drizzle
To grab a branch, from the great one: open war.

But, historically, the Armada was not the only conflict between England and a Spanish-speaking country. In 1982, England fought a war against Argentina over the Falkland Islands (a place that was not yet discovered when the prophecies were published). Just for fun, to illustrate the multiplicity of applications, let's see how V-35 can be applied to the Falklands War using a Spanish translation (Spanish was surmised to be the underlying language of the VMS for this prophecy).

Por libre urbe de la gran mar Salina,

The Argentines have their own name for the Falkland Islands, which is Malvinas. The mar Salina, switching emphasis to the noun mar, comes close.
 

Solomon Prophecy Allusion to the Malvinas

With Malinas we are only missing a v before the letters in. Curiously, Solomon Prophecy IX-49 says "Le sel & vin luy seront à l'enuers," the salt and wine shall be to the inverse, surely inspiring the "vin & sel" in the last verse of stanza V-34. Thus, the salt connects with the Seline of the first verse of V-35 whereupon the vin allows the insertion of a v in front of the in of malinas, giving us:

MALVINAS

We imagine that the capital S in Salina should refer to the name of a specific sea, such as the South Atlantic, or Sudatlántica in Spanish.

Que porta de nuevo al estómago la piedra,

We have been working with Spanish so let's now for a moment turn our attention to the language of the other combatant, England, and replace estómago and piedra with their English equivalents:

Que PORTa de nuevo al STomach la STone,

PORT STanley was the capital city of the Falklands and site of the final battle of the Falklands War.

Note that the República de Buenos Aires (the free city of the first verse) first seized possession of the Falkland Islands in the early 1800s, so the seizure of 1982 was indeed a repeated (French encore, Spanish de nuevo) event.

Flota inglesa vendrá bajo la llovizna

Llovizna is a translation of the French bruine, a word that derives from the Latin pruina which referred to wintry weather. Hence, the English fleet (classe is a Frenchification of the Latin classis referring to a land army or, more often, to a fleet, here chosen because of the sea in the first verse) sails into freezing weather which is thought to have been a major factor leading to the rapid defeat of the Argentine troops entrenched on the Islands.

Una rama prender, del grande guerra abierta.

To grab a branch of what? Well, the English fleet sailed into the cold to take back a branch of the British Empire, ie. the Falkland Islands.

The French du grand (masculine gender) cannot modify ouverte guerre (feminine gender) and the same logic applies to Spanish. So from the great what will come open war? Well, from Great Britain will come the open war. Indeed, the open war (the first spilling of blood) occurred when a British submarine, surreptitiously guided by American satellites, torpedoed an Argentine cruiser trying to flee the conflict zone, killing a few hundred sailors.

And finally, what about the stone to the stomach? To understand this one, we need only look at a map:

Solomon Prophecy Allusion to the Falkland Islands

Today, no one can be fooled into thinking that Solomon's Prophecies reflect one iota of genuine knowledge of the future, but back in the 16th century, occult sciences like astrology and alchemy afflicted kings, queens, and even great scholars.


For more information:


Some years ago Morten St. George wrote a book about his early efforts to locate Solomon's Prophecies (not then called by that name) within the Nostradamus prophecies. It provides English translation and commentary on dozens of prophecies. Anyone interested in this theme can acquire his book as a paperback or Kindle ebook from Amazon.com:

Incantation of the Law Against Inept Critics
Paperback Edition


Incantation of the Law Against Inept Critics
Kindle Edition

Sale proceeds are used to promote the author's theories but people without funds to spare should note that parts of the book and much of the information contained therein can be found online and read free of charge.